I John Smith (not my real name just an alias and not a whistle-blower but instead a private citizen via my redacted
email address) has already sent the email in question to Jordan Petersons wife, Evening Standard, Rudy Giuliani, WayOfTheBern
(who I originally sent to WayOfTheBern
privately for feedback purposes), LBC, Henry Jackson Society, Eric July, Telegraph inquiries, Julia Hartley Brewer, Leader of the house of commons cabinet office, Quilliam foundation (hoping that would reach Majjid Nawza), Treasuray Solicitor, Tulsi Gabbard, Tim Pool, Whistleblower, The MP who is currently The Attorney General for The United Kingdom at the time of this email, Daily express, Daily Mail, Julia Hartley Brewer, Jonathan Pie, Iain Dale, free speech union, Pierce Bainbridge, L lin Wood, Jonathan Guills, Telegraph investigations departement, Lindsay Hole, Kemi Badenoch, Jacob Rees Mogg, defund the BBC (since Calvin Robinson works there hoping that the email in question is referred to Calvin Robinson), Guido Fawkes, Daily express, The Crown Prosecution Service (specifically their inquiries departement), The Attorney General office, The Advertising Standards Authority, Ofcom, The Spectator UK, The Spectator USA and The Spectator Australia, Douglas Murray (who I was hoping that if The Spectator did not see the email in question that since Douglas Murray works for The Spectator, Douglas Murray would notify The Spectator of the email in question), The Private Eye, The equalities office for the United Kingdom, MP Desmond Swayne, I news editorial division, I news reader division, Calvin Robinson, Konstantin Kisin, Count Dankulas Lawyer, Crimebodge, CPS London Magistratex and Solicitor Ian Guld who all of them have not reply me back (or in the case of Gudio Fawkes refuse to read the email in question below due to its length or in the case of CPS London Magistrates life gets in the way and I get nervous due to me not being certain if this was the right address or due to previous experiences if I was going to be taken seriously) but thought you might be interested in as it deals with intustonlized misconduct and corruption.
Keep in mind this I don't not wish to make any personal finical gain out of this and that for this to be referred to cps as soon as possible as these potentially illegal pratices as stated within the email in question has lead to some personal to me defndning abhorrent things (I.e. Jacob blake) and believing in falsehoods.
I was originally going to do this as one big post but dye to reddit 40000 characters on post policy one had to split this into 2 parts.
My hope for this email is to kick-start an investigation which can then not only be published but also be referred to the likes of CPS for further investigation which can result in potential prosecutions as further explained in the email in question not only can these illegal/misleading pratices affect and decive people but also can cause them into defending people who have committed abhorrent things.
For The Private eye, The Spectator and Douglas Murray I sent this a list of commands offering this story but to no avail with these list of 8 demands:
- To be a able to send my investigation annoymusly without fear of reprisal.
- If it is publishded in one of your issues then for it to be done in both of your magazines and in the case of The Private Eye as a special report similar to that of the expose of the post office back in March/April of 2020.
- For this to be kept under wraps and not to be reported in either magizine until all investigations and trials have been completed.
- For this to be considered my extremely early entry for the next Paul Foot award.
- For this to be sent to both the head of The Crown Prosecution Service and The Attorney General of The United Kingdom (as well as their respective body's).
- For both Ian Hislop and Andrew Neil to be kept away from this due to it relating to a former employer which would consistitue a conflict of interest if either of them got involved in this.
- If this does lead to legal action being taken then for me to be able to testify anonymously due to me being both underage (17 at the time of writing this email) and autistic.
- For Ofcom, The Crown Prosecution Service and for The Attorney Geneal to be questioned on why I wasnt contacted back about this.
Keep in mind this since the original version of the email in question was made and sent I've encountered even more evidence of misconduct by the BBC, Channel 4, Channel 4 news and a new offender in the form of sainsbury's so the email in question is to be treated similar to that of the theratical cut of a film as I'm developing what amounts to the directors cut of the email in question.
If there's things that are outdated in the email in question that's because this was sent originally on the 8th of September 2020 so information should be correct at the time of the email in question.
Email in question:
Dear Ofcom, Advertising Standards Authority and Crown Prosecution Service
I am writing this to present evidence which can easily lead to an investigation into multiple people and organisations with those being: Naga Munchetty, Lewis Goodall, Channel 4 news, Cathy Newman, John Snow, Dorothy Byrne The Guardian, Channel 4 and the BBC.
In regards to Naga Munchetty she has recently be found to not only have been paid to do a speech with Rollys Royce durning a virtual conference but also that she did consult the BBC first and actively tried to hide it so it would be wise to see if she's been involved in any other finical conflicts of interest recently.
Naga Munchetty caught trying to hide a massive conflict of interest in regards to her speaker role with Rolls Royce: https://inews.co.uk/news/naga-munchetty-conflict-interest-warning-bbc-moonlighting-aston-martin-pr-video-574797
In regards to Lewis Goodall (who by the way has worked for progressive think tank Institute for Public Policy Research in the past as well as working inside 10 Downing Street under Theresa May before working back in brodcasting) has recently did a front page cover story for The New Statesman (who by the way on their website says their liberal and progressive) which is not only a conflict of interest in regards to due impartiality but also a finical conflict of interest since Lewis Goodall is being paid as a guest columnist to critize the government even though under 15.3.17 of the BBC's impartality guidelines bans anyone from expressing strong views, advocating against a policy and exhorting change in a policy.
How even the Institute for Public Policy own website describe themselves as a progressive think tank: https://www.ippr.org/
Where Lewis Goodall went after intially leaving brodcast journalism before he came back: https://www.theweek.co.uk/107867/bbc-newsnight-editor-lewis-goodall-accused-bias-new-statesman-article
How even the New Statesman website describe themselves as progressive and liberal: https://www.newstatesman.com/page/about
How Lewis Goodall broke 15.3.17 on the BBC' guidance on impartality: https://order-order.com/2020/08/20/how-goodall-spectacularly-broke-the-bbcs-guidelines-on-impartiality/
In regards to Channel 4 news I have been noticing that they've have been omitting information from their news reports (as well as not correcting errors from previous news reports which if included said information would change the entire context of their news story. In order to give you an idea of this I shall use 11 examples to prove my point.
Example 1: https://www.channel4.com/news/protests-erupt-in-wisconsin-after-police-shooting-of-black-man
Example 2: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QoMKHlciP-4#
Example 3 (same as example 2 but only 6 minutes instead of 10 minutes): https://www.channel4.com/news/former-trump-adviser-defends-wisconsin-police-who-shot-jacob-blake-in-the-back
Example 4 (same video as example 11): https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v4metQOo67I
Not only have Channel 4 news decided not to disclose the fact that in all of the first four examples that the police were there to arrest Jacob Blake for allegedly committing sexual assult (as well as having an arrest warrant for a previous felony sexual assult charge) minutes before the police arrived on scene (which is falsely claimed in example 1 that Jacob was there to break up a domestic dispute between two women which in reality had violated a restraining order as well as the fact that the victims car keys was stolen which she then called the cops and purses Jacob which wasn't disclosed in any of the first four examples) and the fact that the police allegedly told Jacob to "drop the knife" which why they had tasered him in the first place but also that when police told him to stop not not only did Jacob go to the car which had multiple children inside but also that not only was it later revealed that Jacob confessed to having a knife but also said knife was found inside the floorboards of the car (which the alleged sexual assult plus the fact that Jacob was tasered and ignored the cops about to get a knife out of the car was the reason why he was shot which goes directly against example 1 claim of Jacob being unarmed when shot which wasn't corrected in examples 2, 3 and 4) with Channel 4 news also failing to disclose in example 4 that Jacob Blake's father has made several anti-semitic and anti-white comments on Facebook.
The background and full context as to why Jacob Blake was shot: https://nypost.com/2020/08/28/this-is-why-jacob-blake-had-a-warrant-out-for-his-arrest/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
Police dispatch audio proving that Jacob Blake wasn't there to stop a domestic dispute between two women: https://madison365.com/kenohsa-police-opened-fire-less-than-5-minutes-after-being-called-scanner-audio/
Kenosha police alleging that Jacob had a knife in his hand which lead to Jacob being shot contradicting the Wisconsin Attorney General: https://nypost.com/2020/08/29/kenosha-cops-say-jacob-blake-was-holding-knife-contradicting-ag/
Not only do the Wisconsin Department of Justice Reval that there was a knife had been found in the car that Jacob Blake's was rushing to but also that he confessed to having a knife: https://nypost.com/2020/08/26/jacob-blake-had-a-knife-in-his-car-when-he-was-shot-by-police-doj/
Jacob Blake's father history of anti-semitic and anti-white Facebook posts: https://mobile.twitter.com/ReaganBattalion/status/1301299394952736771
Example 5: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lDLtondx66k
Example 6: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_kiUMqHM7Pg
Not only have Channel 4 news decided not to disclose the fact that Kyle Rittenhouse lawyer has claimed that Kyle Rittenhouse was working as a community lifeguard on the day in question to help out clean graffiti and damage from a local highschool (with Channel 4 news also claiming he's a white supremacist even though there has been no evidence to condclude that Kyle was part of a white supremacist group as the local vigantile group The Kenosha Guard has said that they're not certain if Kyle Rittenhouse were part of their group so the claim of white supremacist is unproven at best and baseless and false at worst) whilst also withholding the fact that Kyle received information of a call from a local auto dealership who need help protecting his business from further destruction (where once police dispersing a croward came past Kyle where although they were being taunting and threatened towards Kyle no physical altercation took place) but also that in the guns used in the killing were not only provided to Kyle (which is falsely claimed in example 5 and not corrected in example 6 that the guns used in the killing were from outside the state of Wisconsin as well as not disclosing the fact that Kyle may have a claim to self defence due to how wide Wisconsin state law on concealed carrying in regards to an exception for rifles and shotguns, intended to allow people age 16 and 17 to hunt as well as Channel 4 news not disclosing that Wisconsin is an open carry state) and from within the state of Wisconsin but also that not only did the local police change formation and close down a route which Kyle used to go between the auto mechanic shop and gas station after Kyle went back to the gas station the second time after helping out people who were injured by admistrating first aid or directing them to place which dealt with more serious injuries (and confirming there were no more injuries) Kyle after learning that the police had blocked his path back to the auto shop and complying with them was going back to the gas station where Mr. Rittenhouse was latter seen being chased by an unknown group of people into the parking lot of another dealership several blocks away when Kyle's first victim Joseph Rosebum (who Channel 4 news hid the fact that he was a convicted pedophile and had occured 42 disciplinary infractions in Arizona federal prison) not only taunted at Kyle to shoot him in the head (which channel 4 news also hid the fact of) but also that then at the same time an unknown 3rd party trying to shoot at Kyle (which Channel 4 news did not disclose) which then lead to Kyle not only running for his life but also that whilst being chased down not only was Kyle ambushed by Joseph Rosebum who tried and failed to disarm him (with Channel 4 news also failing to disclosing that something was thrown at Kyle Rittenhouse by Joseph Rosebum) who then got shot and later died, Gaige Grosskreutz and Anthony Hubertried tried to ambush Kyle (who Channel 4 news in example 4 and not corrected in example 5 claim that both were not armed even though video evidence is show with Gauge Grosskreutz having a gun) with Kyle then running for his life who unintentionality tripped over and with two people attacking him on the ground (with Anthony Hubertried using a skateboard to smash Kyle over the head and Gauge Grosskreutz having a gun which Channel 4 news did not disclosing the fact that both Anothh Hubertried and Gauge Grosskreutz were armed with Channel 4 news also falsely claiming that they were both unarmed along with not disclosing the fact that they both had criminal records for battery, strangulation and intoxication with Gauge Grosskreutz having a gun) and just as other people where closing in on Kyle, after Kyle shot twice (one to Anothny Hubertried who later died and one to Gauge Grosskreutz) after calling someone saying that he killed then tried to turn himself in but the police ignored him at the time wanting for him to move from the area (which Channel 4 news did not disclose the fact that he handed himself into Antioch, Illinois police).
The fact that even the local malitia group The Kenosha Guard is uncertain if Kyle Rittenhouse was connected to their group as well as confessing to someone on the phone that he killed someone: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/what-we-know-so-far-about-kyle-rittenhouse-accused-vigilante-in-kenosha-shooting/ar-BB18p9Dw
Kyle Rittenhouse lawyer discussing why Kyle Rittenhouse was in Kenosha on the day in question: https://www.scribd.com/document/474027394/Pierce-Bainbridge-Statement-on-Kyle-Rittenhouse-8-28-20?fbclid=IwAR2dLfHpBVMQGuwGs6Viknh88hEkrnyiT18P-QDe0zBqftN5y88T_WuHWdM
How Wisconsin is an open carry state: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Wisconsin
How not only that Kyle Rittenhouse may have a self-defence claim due to how poorly worded and wide Wisconsin Gun laws are in regards to an exception for rifles and shotguns, intended to allow people age 16 and 17 to hunt but also how the guns used in the killings were within Wisconsin (and that Wisconsin is an open carry state): https://eu.jsonline.com/story/news/crime/2020/08/26/wisconsin-open-carry-law-kyle-rittenhouse-legally-have-gun-kenosha-protest-shooting-17-year-old/3444231001/
Police changing tatic and referning protest down towards Kyle Rittenhouse: https://mobile.twitter.com/EstaVivo/status/1300132953314525185
Kyle Rittenhouse providing EMT support: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/27/us/kyle-rittenhouse-kenosha-shooting-video.html
Joseph Rosebum taunting Kyle Rittenhouse to shoot him in the head: https://twitter.com/Julio_Rosas11/status/1298474730966659072?s=20
Article on Joseph Rosebum taunting Kyle Rittenhouse to shoot him in the head: https://nationalfile.com/video-rioter-repeatedly-says-shoot-me-nga-get-shot-in-the-head-moments-late
How Joseph Rosebum has been convicted for child molestation and accumulated 42 displinary infractions whilst in Arizona federal prison for said sexual conduct with a minor: https://nationalfile.com/kenosha-protester-allegedly-shot-in-head-by-kyle-rittenhouse-was-convicted-pedophile/
Further evidence on how Joseph Rosebum is a convicted pedophile and had 42 displinary infractions whilst in Arizona federal prison for child molestation: https://www.bailbondshq.com/arizona/azdoc-inmate-JOSEPH/172556
An unknown 3rd party firning the 1st shot: https://twitter.com/trbrtc/status/1298840777251008512?s=20
Joseph Rosebum ambushing Kyle Rittenhouse causing Kyle Rittenhouse to shoot him: https://twitter.com/AntifaWatch2/status/1298649108585099264?s=20
Anthony Hubertried chasing and ambushing Kyle Rittenhouse with his skateboard: https://nationalfile.com/man-who-attacked-kyle-rittenhouse-with-skateboard-convicted-for-domestic-abuse-twice/
Anothny Hubertried littany of convictions including battery and strangulation part 1: https://wcca.wicourts.gov/caseDetail.html?caseNo=2012CF001346&countyNo=30&index=0&mode=details
Anthony Hubertried littany of convictions including battery and assult part 2: https://wcca.wicourts.gov/caseDetail.html?caseNo=2018CM000509&countyNo=30&index=0&mode=details
Gauge Grosskreutz criminal track record: https://wcca.wicourts.gov/caseDetail.html?caseNo=2016CM001014&countyNo=40&index=0&mode=details
Gauge Grosskreutz having an gun: https://nypost.com/2020/08/28/alleged-kenosha-shooters-lawyer-claims-self-defense-amid-new-video/
Image of both Anothny Hubertried and Gauge Grosskreutz using an object as a weapon and having a gun respectively: https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1298693105617534976?s=20
How both Gauge Grosskreutz and Anthony Hubertried ambush Kyle Rittenhouse and attacked him both the both got shot: https://nypost.com/2020/08/26/videos-capture-wild-moments-that-led-to-deadly-shootings-in-kenosha/
Videos showing both Gauge Grosskreutz and Anothny Hubertried chasing after Kyle Rittenhouse who were both armed: https://twitter.com/trbrtc/status/1298842098163216384?s=20
How Kyle Rittenhouse tried to turn himself in but the police ignored him: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/08/29/world/crime-legal-world/us-kyle-rittenhouse-kenosha-police-brutality-protests/
Example 7: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QoMKHlciP-4
Not only have Channel 4 news not disclosed the fact that the Kenosha county board of supervisors has written a letter wanting Donald Trump to visit Kenosha and not cancel his visit to Kenosha but also that Channel 4 news not only keeps falsely claiming that Jacob Blake was unarmed but also that it falsely claimed by channel 4 news that Donald Trump wasn't invited to visit Kenosha even though the Kenosha county board of supervisors encouraged him not to cancel his visit to Kenosha.
The Kenosha County board of supervisors encouraging Trump to visit Kenosha: https://abc13.com/president-trump-donald-kenosha-riots/6397038/
Kenosha County board encouraging Trump to go to Kenosha: https://eu.jsonline.com/story/news/2020/08/29/president-trump-visit-kenosha-tuesday-after-jacob-blake-shooting-protest-deaths-rittenhouse/5671797002/
Example 8: https://www.channel4.com/news/trump-denies-calling-american-war-dead-losers-and-suckers
Example 9: https://www.channel4.com/news/trump-called-killed-and-captured-american-soldiers-losers-and-suckers-allege-reports
Not only has Channel 4 news failed to mention that the article they mentioned (written by The Atlantic which alleged trump called WW1 soldiers losers and that he didn't attend the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris in 2018 because Trump featured his hair would get wet due to the rain) is not only owned by Steve Jobs widow Laurene Powell Jobs (which she owns The Atlantic via The Emerson Collective) who has donated over $600,000 to Joe Biden's campaign (which in of itself should consistitue a massive conflict of interest) but also that Channel 4 news has falsely claimed that not only Trump wouldn't attend the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris in 2018 because Trump feared that his hair would get wet due to the rain (which in reality was due the president’s helicopter Marine One being grounded due to bad weather which was decided by the Marine Corps and the White House Military Office, which then presents the recommendation to the White House in collaboration with the Secret Service,) with Channel 4 news also not disclosing that John Bolton, Jordan Karem, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Hogan Gidley and Keith Kellogg all and out publicily saying that Trump didn't say anything of those things on the day in question since they where with Trump when this allegedly happended but also that both Stephen Miler and Dan Scavino have come out publicaly stating (as well as showing in emails between them and secret and classified internal White House contacts) that Trump wasn't able to attend the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris in 2018 because the president’s helicopter Marine One was grounded due to bad weather which was decided by the Marine Corps and the White House Military Office, which then presents the recommendation to the White House in collaboration with the Secret Service and not because Trump feared that his hair would get wet due to the rain as originally claimed in The Atlantic and Examples 8 and 9 with Example 9 also not showing the CCTV evidence from the earthcam in time Square but also didn't show all the footage in terms of the footage shown of the driver going through the protestors which if shown would illustrate that the protestors were blocking the path of the car with the car driver honking his vehicle for the demonstrators to move out of the way which they refuse to do so.
The original The Atlantic article in question: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/09/trump-americans-who-died-at-war-are-losers-and-suckers/615997/
A summary of who is Laurene Powell Jobs: https://www.forbes.com/profile/laurene-powell-jobs/
Laurene Powell Jobs being the founder of The Emerson Collective: https://web.archive.org/web/20150811094732/http://www.emersoncollective.com/about/laurene-powell-jobs/
The Atlantic being bought by The Emerson Collective which in of itself is owned by Laurene Powell Jobs: https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/20/laurene-jobs-the-atlantic-072210
Laurene Powell Jobs donating over $600,000 to Joe Biden's presidential campaign via The Emerson Collective: https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?committee_id=C00703975&committee_id=C00744946&contributor_name=Jobs%2C+Laurene&contributor_employer=Emerson+collective&two_year_transaction_period=2020&min_date=01%2F01%2F2019&max_date=12%2F31%2F2020
The president’s helicopter Marine One being grounded due to bad weather which was decided by the Marine Corps and the White House Military Office, which then presents the recommendation to the White House in collaboration with the Secret Service and not because Trump feared his hair would get wet part 1: https://apnews.com/52462add34fd45ecb16319b564045d61
The president’s helicopter Marine One being grounded due to bad weather which was decided by the Marine Corps and the White House Military Office, which then presents the recommendation to the White House in collaboration with the Secret Service and not because Trump feared his hair would get wet part 2: https://twitter.com/JasonLeopold/status/1301673157699407873?s=20
John Bolton denying that Donald Trump said that WW1 splicers were losers on the day in question since they where with Trump when this allegedly happended: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/515132-john-bolton-says-he-didnt-hear-trump-insult-fallen-soldiers-in-france?amp#click=https://t.co/MwmtakdFj8
Jordan Karem denying that Donald Trump said that WW1 splicers were losers on the day in question since they where with Trump when this allegedly happended: https://twitter.com/JordanKarem1/status/1301656144713265158?s=20
Sarah Huckabee Sanders denying that Donald Trump said that WW1 splicers were losers on the day in question since they where with Trump when this allegedly happended: https://mobile.twitter.com/SarahHuckabee/status/1301702348071460864?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1301702679790485506%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2Fanonymous-sources-tell-mag-trump-called-dead-troops-losers-5-witnesses-go-on-record-to-dispute%3F3Futm_source%3Dtwitter
Hogan Gidley denying that Donald Trump said that WW1 splicers were losers on the day in question since they where with Trump when this allegedly happended: https://mobile.twitter.com/JHoganGidley/status/1301681054902779905?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1301681054902779905%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2Fanonymous-sources-tell-mag-trump-called-dead-troops-losers-5-witnesses-go-on-record-to-dispute%3F3Futm_source%3Dtwitter
Keith Kellogg denying that Donald Trump said that WW1 splicers were losers on the day in question since they where with Trump when this allegedly happended: https://mobile.twitter.com/DanScavino/status/1301714039907725314?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1301714039907725314%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2Fanonymous-sources-tell-mag-trump-called-dead-troops-losers-5-witnesses-go-on-record-to-dispute%3F3Futm_source%3Dtwitter
Stephen Miler and Dan Scavino both publicaly saying (as well as showing in emails between them and secret and classified internal White House contacts) that Trump wasn't able to attend the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris in 2018 because the president’s helicopter Marine One was grounded due to bad weather which was decided by the Marine Corps and the White House Military Office, which then presents the recommendation to the White House in collaboration with the Secret Service and not because Trump feared that his hair would get wet due to the rain as originally claimed in The Atlantic and in Examples 7 and 8 of potentially deceptive reporting by Channel 4 news: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house-officials-deny-trump-disparaged-war-dead-and-say-he-was-livid-he-could-not-visit-french-cemetery
Full footage from the times Square incident which Channel 4 news only showed part of: https://twitter.com/datainput/status/1301674733172338688?s=20
Footage from the times Square incident from an alternative angle via earthcam which Channel 4 news did not show: https://twitter.com/cbenavidesTV/status/1301694777419853825?s=20
Example 10: https://www.channel4.com/news/none-of-us-can-breathe-until-we-get-justice-for-george-floyd-floyd-family-lawyer-benjamin-crump
Example 11 (same as Example 4): https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v4metQOo67I
After Example 10 was made and in Example 11 by Channel 4 news not only have Channel 4 news failed to disclose that the bodycam footage leading up to George Floyd has been released (which shows George Floyd not only disobeying police orders and resiting arrest) but also that not only did George Floyd said "I can't breath" whilst police were trying to get him in the back of the police car before asking to be put on the ground but also that not only Channel 4 news has refused to mention that the Minneapolis Police training manual instructs officers on how to subdue violent or resisting suspects by placing their knee on the neck of said suspect but also that it's been revealed that George Floyd's had a fatal fentanyl level of 11 which under normal circumstances would kill someone 2 to 3 times over which Channel 4 news has not disclosed (with all 3 medical reports admitting that he was on drugs durning his death as well as having Covid-19) and that if George Floyd had died somewhere else and there were no contributing circumstances then George Floyd's death would be ruled as an drug overdose death (though the two other memos filed Tuesday from the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office about conversations with Chief Hennepin County Medical Examiner Dr. Andrew could be incomplete because they were awaiting microscopic slides, pictures and other evidence from the Hennepin County Medical Examiner’s report).
Police cam footage from Thomas Lane point of view: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VhwxGzYU2ts
Not only George Floyd resting arrest and police orders but also not only saying "I can't breathe" before he's even entered the police car but also asking to go onto the ground: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XkEGGLu_fNU
Transcript of bodycam footage leading up to George Floyd's death: https://www.startribune.com/read-the-transcript-of-thomas-lane-s-body-camera-footage/571678791/
Confirmed reports of the Minneapolis Police training manual instructing officers how to subdue violent or resisting suspects by placing their knee on the neck of said suspect: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/minneapolis-p-d-trained-officers-to-use-the-neck-restraint-that-killed-george-floyd-docs/ar-BB16vgu6
Courts documents concluding that George Floyd died at least in part due to a drug overdose part 1: https://mobile.twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1298403284416249856?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Courts documents concluding that George Floyd died at least in part due to a drug overdose part 2: https://www.fox9.com/news/court-filings-medical-examiner-thought-george-floyd-had-fatal-level-of-fentanyl-in-system
How George Floyd had covid-19 durning his death: https://www.snopes.com/ap/2020/06/04/autopsy-report-shows-floyd-tested-positive-for-coronavirus/
In regards to Cathy Newman in terms of what she did in the video below her actions would fall under both Monroe v Hopkins of 2017 and McAlpine v Bercow of 2013 as not only did Cathy knew what she was saying was wrong but also unlike Monroe V Hopkins of 2017 (where you can at least say that Katie Hopkins intially didn't realise that her comments were addressed to the wrong person) and McAlpine v Bercow of 2013 (where you can say at least that Bercow didn't realise that the information she was intially spreading at the time was false) when push came to shove and CCTV evidence showed that Cathy Newman had lied in her tweets although both Cathy Newman and Dorothy Byrne did later apologise not only did the mosque in question receive death threats but also that Cathy Newman then later did another bad faith interview with Jordan Peterson.
Video of Cathy Newman in question: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMJ_rkCGc48
Cathy Newman and Dorothy Byrne having to apologise for Cathy Newman lyning about the mosques treatment of Cathy Newman: https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-31443076
The Cathy Newman and Jordan Peterson interview: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54
A dissection on why the Jordan Peterson interview was done in such bad faith by Uri Harris part 1: https://quillette.com/2018/01/17/jordan-b-peterson-critical-theory-new-bourgeoisie/
A dissection on why the Jordan Peterson was done in such bad faith by Uri Harris part 2: https://quillette.com/2018/02/02/deep-dive-jordan-petersons-channel-4-interview/
Uri Harris creditanls with a MSc in Business and Economics: https://www.mindingthecampus.org/authouri-harris/
In regards to Jon Snow after the investigation into the pro-brexit rally he was cleared of back in 2019 there may have been a line of inquiry missed in terms of that investigation as back in 2017 allegations came out against Jon Snow where it's alleged that durning Glastonbury (on the day before a mass address was to be made by Jeremy Corbyn) John Snow made disparaging comments about the Tories (which he then said he had no recollection of saying that) which from all the evidence that I can see wasn't investigated by anybody (though Channel 4 did at least remind Jon Snow of of his duties in regards to due impartality) which could constitute evidence of bad character under The Criminal Justice Act of 2003 Chapter 1 evidence of bad character explanatory notes.
Jon Snow being cleared of comments made during pro-brexit rally: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/jon-snow-cleared-over-remark-he-made-about-white-people-at-probrexit-rally-a4205831.html
Allegations of making disparaging comments about the Tories whilst at Glastonbury: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/jon-snow-glastonbury-festival-f-word-tories-chant-rant-channel-4-news-anchor-journalist-a7811591.html
Jon Snow having no recollection of allegedly saying disparaging comments about the Tories at Glastonbury on the day before Jeremy Corbyn was due to do a mass address: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tv-veteran-jon-snow-no-10697509
Jon Snow having to be reminded about his role in regards to due impartality after allegations emerging of him making disparaging comments about the Tories at Glastonbury: https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/jon-snow-given-warning-channel-10786053
Criminal Justice Act of 2003 explanatory notes Chapter 1 evidence of bad character: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/44/notes/division/4/11/1?view=plain
In regards to Dorothy Byrne not only was she the person who has overseen seen the potentially misleading news reporting of Channel 4 news and both the Cathy Newman and Jon Snow situations but also back in 2019 durning 2019 durning her MacTaggart lecture Dorothy Byrne had called Boris Johnson both "a coward" (but did also say that Jeremy Corbyn was "a coward") and "a known liar" as well as comparing him to Vladimir Putin (as well as doubling down on her comments after initial comments) which if it was said privately but leaked to the public would be concerning but at the very least you could say that their her own private personal views or if it was a low ranking Channel 4 news you could say she's lacks authority to do newspieces however though this was said in public and was videotaped which not only calls into question due impartality since she's the head of Channel 4 news (which a reasonable person would suspect that Dorothy Buren would order her employees to do more negative stories on Boris Johnson since she has an axe to grind with Boris Johnson) but also that this was said back in August 22-23 2019 about 3-4 months to the 2019 General Election a reasonable person would suspect that Dorothy Buren would order her employees to do more negative stories on Boris Johnson since she has an axe to grind with Boris Johnson along the fact that with the above statement above Boris Johnson it would be in her best interest in protecting people who disavow Boris Johnson which is why there needs to be an independent investigation into Jon Snow's comments at Glastonbury as well as a reinvestigation into his comments at the Pro-brexit rally instead of an internal investigation by Channel 4 news since not only would it be a conflict of interest but also that the investigation would be buried and turned into a complete and utter whitewash.
Dorothy Byrne comments at the MacTaggart lecture calling Boris Johnson a "know liar": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XIEFKEw4co
Video interview of Dorothy Byrne doubling down on her initial comments in an interview with Sky News: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uapRPowoQZM
Dorothy Byrne doubling down on her initial comments: https://news.sky.com/story/number-10-hits-back-at-channel-4-bosss-claim-boris-johnson-is-known-liar-11791576
(... end of part 1)