Hacked hacker evolution untold full

Shipping is not included, will be sent media mail, I will calculate based on weight. If you need any additional pictures, just ask and I’ll get some for you.
Pictures
HAVE
ABSOLUTES

• Absolute Green Arrow by Kevin Smith - $35 (New/Sealed)

TRADES/HARDCOVERS
DC

• Batman: Death and the Maidens - $8
  
• Batman: Face the Face - $8
  
• Batman New Gotham: Evolution - $4
  
• Booster Gold TPB Vol 1-6 (Full run) - $60
  
• Dial H: Vol. 1-2 - $15
  
• JLA: Earth 2 TPB - $8
  
• Superman: Mon-El: Man of Valor HC - $4
  
• Superman: Secret Identity - $8
  
• Superman/Batman Vol. 2-3 (New Editions) - $10 each or $18 for both (Unread)
  
• Supergirl by Peter David Vol. 1 (New Edition) - $10 (Unread)
  

IMAGE

• Walking Dead Compendium Vol. 1-4 - $90 for set (Unread) (I also have an extra Vol 4 that I’ll sell for $25)

MARVEL
Astonishing X-Men: Until Our Hearts Stop - $5
FLOPPIES

• N52 Batman Black & White #1-6 - $8
  
• N52 Batman/Superman #1-17, Annual #1, Huntress/Powergirl #20-21 (for crossover) - $18
  
• Batman: Journey Into Knight #2-5 - $1.50 or free with another purchase
  
• Untold Legend of Batman #1-3 - $2
  
• N52 Deathstroke (First Series) #1-8, 15-20 - $8
  
• N52 Deathstroke (Second Series) #1-3 - $2
  
• Larfleeze #1-12 (Complete) - $10
  
• Superman/Wonder Woman #1-3 - $2
  
• Superman/Batman: Generations 3 Complete Run #1-12 - $5
  
• Superman: World of Krypton #1-3 - $2
  

WANT

• Flash by Johns Book 4
  
• Flash by Waid Books 4-7
  
• Robin TPBs
  
• Flex Mentallo TPB
  
• Green Lantern: Kyle Rayner TPBs
  
• Batman: Dark Knight Detective TPBs
  
• Batman: Caped Crusader TPBs
  
• Batman: Shadow of the Bat TPBs
  
• Gotham City Sirens Vol. 2
  
• Berserk: Deluxe Editions 2-5
  
• DC Absolutes
  
• Statues
  
• Blu-ray offers
  
• OR PAYPAL
  

If you have a list, I would love to take a peek at it!
Crossposted on FB

'''
I e to my MP regarding the food standards levels that he refused to vote for. He responded. I'll leave any identifying details out,
It follows:
​
'Thank you for contacting me about food standards and the Agriculture Bill. I was elected on a manifesto commitment that we will not compromise on our standards. I appreciate the sentiment of the amendments tabled by the House of Lords to the Agriculture Bill, however, the profound actions taken by the UK Government ensure our world-leading environmental protection, animal welfare and food standards will not be compromised as we negotiate new trade deals. I welcome that the UK Government has extended the Trade and Agriculture Commission (TAC), placing it on a full statutory footing in the Trade Bill and giving farmers a stronger voice in UK trade policy. Having initially been launched for a six-month period to bring together voices from across the sector and report back to inform top-level trade policy and negotiations, the TAC will continue past its previous fixed term. The commission will have a more active role through a new legislative underpinning, to be reviewed every three years. Listening to calls from the NFU, the TAC will produce a report on the impact on animal welfare and agriculture of each new free trade deal the government signs after the end of the EU transition period on 1 January. This report will be laid in Parliament by the Department for International Trade before the start of the 21-day scrutiny period of the free trade deal under the terms of the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act. The move – part of the government’s ambition to place farmers at the heart of its trade policy – will allow MPs access to independent and expert advice when reviewing the impact of each trade deal on farming. I am pleased to see this decision welcomed by Andrew McCormick, President of the National Farmers Union of Scotland and member of the TAC. In due course, the Secretary of State for International Trade will receive the TAC’s first report, advising on; trade policies the Government should adopt to secure opportunities for UK farmers, to ensure that animal welfare, food production and environmental standards are not undermined and to identify new export opportunities; advancing and protecting British consumer interests and those of developing countries; how the UK engages the WTO to build a coalition that helps advance higher animal welfare standards across the world; and developing trade policy that identifies and opens up new export opportunities for the UK agricultural industry – in particular for SMEs – and that benefits the UK economy as a whole. The UK Government has also tabled an amendement to the Agriculture Bill to boost parliamentary scrutiny of new free trade deals from 1 January. It will place a duty on the Government to report to Parliament on whether, or to what extent, commitments in new free trade deals relating to agricultural goods are consistent with maintaining UK levels of statutory protection in relation to human, animal and plant life and health; animal welfare; and environmental protection. During trade negotiations, the Department for International Trade consults widely with its agri-food Trade Advisory Group, comprised of farmers and other senior figures from across the industry. The Government also has a suite of tools – including tariffs, tariff rate quotas and safeguards – to ensure that British farmers with their high standards are not unfairly undercut. It is crucial that there is freedom to negotiate these deals on a case-by-case basis. Imposing an outright blanket ban on imports that do not meet UK production standards is not the right way to support our farmers. This would be unprecedented in global trading and would put up more trade barriers than the EU does. Importantly, the UK already imports food from countries such as Canada, South Africa and Japan through preferences in existing free trade agreements – none of these agreements require those countries to follow domestic UK production standards. If such amendments were implemented, the possibility of rolling these over these deals would be made more difficult/impossible. In fact, the WTO actually prohibits such clauses in any trade deals. This would mean that many of the Borders farmers who export around the world would find it significantly more difficult to do so. While I understand the intention behind these requirements, they would in fact cause untold damage to developing countries and our trade policy. Developing countries would struggle to meet these new requirements, with a knock-on impact on their people and economies. It would harm the interests of the UK public and it would hurt the Borders businesses who rely on imported products to manufacture final goods for sale. I must reiterate that chlorine-washed chicken and hormone-fed beef are illegal in the UK and they will not be negotiated as part of any trade agreement. No food may be consumed, sold or imported into the UK unless it meets our high legislative standards. Nothing in this Bill changes that. The law on food standards in the UK has not changed. The Food Standards Agency and Food Standards Scotland will continue to provide independent advice to make sure all food imports comply with our high standards. The recent decisions to amend the Trade and Agriculture Bills are simply another step in this evolution of the UK Government’s approach and are directly informed to the core commitment to not compromise on standards. I have always been clear that any future trade agreements must work for consumers, farmers, and businesses in the UK – these actions are the latest steps in delivering on that commitment.'
That's it. I want to see if your MPs say the (exact) same thing. Or if you think he himself actually believes this bullshit. Have a good one everyone.
'''
Response from my MP, over food safety standards. How does yours compare?
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: Fudamental444